Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
TrentRothallParticipant
Yep same rob it was a profitable trade/day for me. My account went up last night by what i’m assuming is the value of the DHG shares i’ll receive.
TrentRothallParticipantSaid Bitar wrote:wow because it was already a bad week for me in the ASX market but Fairfax was the worst loser.
i put order to sell it monday on the openIt will probably workout in your favour Said because you’ll end up with 1 share in DHG for every 10 as per Robs’s post
TrentRothallParticipantit was similar to my reaction when i looked at IB yesterday and FXJ was down 33%, i was holding it in 2 accounts too! I think i’m ok tho because it was a split.
TrentRothallParticipantDon’t be like this guy. Cracks me up!
TrentRothallParticipantThat’s how i heard it too guys, i think he mentioned he has systems on sp100 and some of the universes with a small number of stocks. Couple that with tight parameters, there might not be many trades.
TrentRothallParticipantagree Julian
TrentRothallParticipantyeah ok, in the last week or year?
Might not want big $$$ with them then, although i think it’s backed ANZ. They have broker recommendations too, like some clients use for the GP
TrentRothallParticipantWould be a good option for longer term portfolios on the asx if you wanted to spread funds across brokers
TrentRothallParticipantYes i have and i’ve been slowly tinkering away testing both, i think i need to finalise one of each to at least have them running on unseen data even if i don’t take them live.
It’s more of a capital issue, i don’t want to spread myself too thin. Especially running a MR on the ASX with the comms. I feel like i can get more bang for my buck with my mean reversion systems at my current level of funds. The CAGR is basically double my rotation/ weekly trend systems i’ve been testing.
That’s my logic anyway, not sure if it’s correct?
TrentRothallParticipantASX MR1 – +2.88%
Finally some good news, it’s a start anyway…
MR2 paused… for now
As predicted last month, pause a system and off she goes (+2.2%). Hopefully it keep heading up (or down) and i will recommence and see if the fill rates stay on track
TrentRothallParticipantNice!
TrentRothallParticipantSaid Bitar wrote:I heard this one will be interesting the second part I have a feeling that since he is talking about ranking it means that he is entering on OpenI think he must enter on the open too, you dont hear much about API etc, i question if he is doing any meaningful trading himself. Not sure
TrentRothallParticipantShould be the same trades everytime, yes
TrentRothallParticipantSmall Ords looking like it could get on with the job. Hopefully it can get up and push through the recent high before taking a breather.
October 6, 2017 at 2:36 am in reply to: Selection bias – how much is too much and general MOC discussion #107816TrentRothallParticipantin the US do they stagger the open like on the ASX ie. open stocks starting with A-F first then G-… etc if so you would get filled in that order if you had a lot of trades on a certain day.
It still confuses me how they can do that, wouldn’t the first batch of stocks opening dictate what will happen later on? If 75% of the first batch gap down 1% then isn’t there a fair chance the last batch will do similar?
-
AuthorPosts