Home › Forums › Trading System Mentor Course Community › Trading System Brainstorming › Group Collaboration System Ideas
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 15, 2016 at 12:05 am #104344AnonymousInactiveDarryl Vink wrote:image resize test…
fail
failJune 15, 2016 at 1:18 am #103756Nick RadgeKeymaster600pxls wide are about as wide as you want. Anything over and the system tries to resize which causes the distortions.
June 15, 2016 at 2:34 am #103757ChrisViridesMemberI get similar results to Darryl and Said, but when I run it with 20 positions at 5% each (no margin) the system goes broke by about 2009. Does anybody else get a similar result?
June 15, 2016 at 4:40 am #103758Nick RadgeKeymasterQuote:the system goes broke by about 2009. Does anybody else get a similar result?Check your commission settings
June 15, 2016 at 6:40 am #104345AnonymousInactiveNick Radge wrote:600pxls wide are about as wide as you want. Anything over and the system tries to resize which causes the distortions.yes i tried resizing to 600pxls horizontal with aspect ratio maintained. the images are now too small though to see the detail. said’s images all seem large (around 1000 pxls it seems) and clear :huh:
June 15, 2016 at 7:28 am #104343TrentRothallParticipantSaid Bitar wrote:Code:LongMAP = Param(“Long MA”,100,1,1000,1);
ShortMAP = Param(“Short MA”,5,1,1000,1);
LongMA = MA(C,LongMAP);
ShortMA = MA(C,ShortMAP);
//———————————————————————————
Cond1 = C > LongMA;
Cond2 = C < ShortMA; RegDura = Param("Linear Regression Duration",20,1,50,1); a = LinearReg(C,RegDura); b = a + 1 * ATR(RegDura); ATRMul = param("ATR Mult",2.5,1,10,0.5); g = a - ATRMul * ATR(RegDura); Cond3 = C < a; Cond4 = IndexFilt AND OptFilt AND HDBFilter ;I used a as the linear regression line
b as the upper channel
and g as the lower channelnormally i use lousy names in the beginning then i make clean up if the system is ok
Hi Said
ggood work, what are you using the top channel for? My results are slightly different to you…. are yours a single run?
June 15, 2016 at 7:31 am #104346ChrisViridesMemberBingo, thanks very much.
June 15, 2016 at 7:36 am #103759ChrisViridesMemberDoes anyone actually plan on trading this system?
If not, why?June 15, 2016 at 7:58 am #104347SaidBitarMemberDarryl Vink wrote:Nick Radge wrote:600pxls wide are about as wide as you want. Anything over and the system tries to resize which causes the distortions.yes i tried resizing to 600pxls horizontal with aspect ratio maintained. the images are now too small though to see the detail. said’s images all seem large (around 1000 pxls it seems) and clear :huh:
I don’t attach the images I use photo bucket to insert the links to the forum
June 15, 2016 at 8:01 am #104348SaidBitarMemberTrent Rothall wrote:Said Bitar wrote:Code:LongMAP = Param(“Long MA”,100,1,1000,1);
ShortMAP = Param(“Short MA”,5,1,1000,1);
LongMA = MA(C,LongMAP);
ShortMA = MA(C,ShortMAP);
//———————————————————————————
Cond1 = C > LongMA;
Cond2 = C < ShortMA; RegDura = Param("Linear Regression Duration",20,1,50,1); a = LinearReg(C,RegDura); b = a + 1 * ATR(RegDura); ATRMul = param("ATR Mult",2.5,1,10,0.5); g = a - ATRMul * ATR(RegDura); Cond3 = C < a; Cond4 = IndexFilt AND OptFilt AND HDBFilter ;I used a as the linear regression line
b as the upper channel
and g as the lower channelnormally i use lousy names in the beginning then i make clean up if the system is ok
Hi Said
ggood work, what are you using the top channel for? My results are slightly different to you…. are yours a single run?
In the beginning I was planning for channel breakout this is why I added the upper channel
And yes my results are single run I will make mcs soon
June 15, 2016 at 8:11 am #104350TrentRothallParticipantPaul Leavitt wrote:Does anyone actually plan on trading this system?
If not, why?Not at this stage, not enough capital at this stage to run multiple systems. Plus i haven’t looked too far into the system but i am thinking there may bee a lot of signals to manage which makes me nervous at the moment, a exploration of my version (might have a error) on the 13/6 has 468 lines of orders/open positions.
Might be able to put another MA of the MA(c,5) – atr*.25 to reduce the signals, no idea if it will work yet though….
That’s just me, looks to be good though
June 15, 2016 at 8:12 am #104352TrentRothallParticipantSaid Bitar wrote:In the beginning I was planning for channel breakout this is why I added the upper channelAnd yes my results are single run I will make mcs soon
I must have a error.. will keep hunting
June 15, 2016 at 8:29 am #104353SaidBitarMemberTrent Rothall wrote:Paul Leavitt wrote:Does anyone actually plan on trading this system?
If not, why?Not at this stage, not enough capital at this stage to run multiple systems. Plus i haven’t looked too far into the system but i am thinking there may bee a lot of signals to manage which makes me nervous at the moment, a exploration of my version (might have a error) on the 13/6 has 468 lines of orders/open positions.
Might be able to put another MA of the MA(c,5) – atr*.25 to reduce the signals, no idea if it will work yet though….
That’s just me, looks to be good though
True there will be lots of signals because you are just putting orders and checking what will be bought.
The entry condition has no special rules just 2.5 ATR from the regression lineJune 15, 2016 at 8:36 am #104354TrentRothallParticipantYeah i thougt that if we made the setup conditions tighter, it may reduce some signls.
Will test tomorrowJune 15, 2016 at 9:37 am #103760ScottMcNabParticipantMaybe just try boosting volume requirement up to 1 mill for the day…and/or MA(volume,10)>1mil etc…extra liquidity when go to sell must be nice….
Just checking…sell is on next open following a higher close ? (or was it on the close itself?)
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.